In the world of estate planning, every situation is unique. Situations that involve second marriages and live-in lovers can reveal competing considerations.

Fortunately, using the law of trusts can often help us accommodate the competing concerns and fashion a comfortable result for all interested parties.

For instance, let us imagine the following scenario. Nathan and Eva have both been married in the past, and they want to live together. They have determined getting married is unduly burdensome and not necessary.

Nathan has two children from a prior marriage: Jane and Samantha. Eva has two children from a prior marriage: Lila and Tom.

Nathan owns the home and wants Eva to be able to live in the house for her remaining single life, if she survives him. What should Nathan do?

Nathan should create a trust agreement that accomplishes these objectives. He will deed the real estate to his trust. This will ensure the terms of his trust control the disposition of the real estate and that this asset will avoid probate.

Nathan will want to pay careful attention to the conditions that could cause the beneficial interest in Eva to cease, such as remarriage or carnal cohabitation.

Also, Nathan might want to consider naming one of his children as co-trustee. The key is to carefully craft the language so as to be very clear about the rights and responsibilities created.

Now, let us consider that Lila has special needs that entitle her to government assistance. Eva’s disposition will want to ensure that Lila’s share may be held in trust for her benefit and perhaps that her brother Tom is the trustee.

If done properly, these funds can be made available for the benefit of Lila while at the same time not jeopardizing her government benefits.

Without the law of trusts, we would not be able to accomplish the same result.

Now, let us consider that Jane is a surgeon. For asset protection purposes, it would be advisable to strongly consider leaving her share in trust so that these assets would not be exposed to lawsuits.

Further, let us assume that Jane will never have children because she is infertile and she will not adopt. In this case, it would be wise to spell out in Jane’s trust that when Jane passes, the property will go to Samantha.

In sum, by the above example we can see trusts can be used to control the flow of assets over time and to preserve government entitlements and protect against legal claims.

If used properly, trust law can prove a wonderful tool to manage competing concerns that naturally arise in the context of cases involving second marriages and live-in lovers.

Mark F. Winn, J.D., Master of Laws (LL.M.) in estate planning, is a local asset protection, estate planning and elder law attorney. www.mwinnesq.com